Response To Lead Blog November 13

I have actually never seen family feud. I have seen game shows like Jeopardy, and I enjoy shows like this. I feel as I am sucked into the action by just watching it. Sometimes, I find myself shouting out the answers to the questions. I did find this clip funny. What made it funny was the way Steve Harvey reacted to the guy answering the questions. He entertained it rather than just completely ignoring the mistake. The laughter of the audience made me laugh even harder. The guy seemed beyond embarrassed, which mad the situation more amusing. I can also relate to this. We all probably can. Being under pressure can make people do things out of panic or nervousness. Sometimes, pressure can make people freeze. I've played games where I had to say the first thing that came to mind in relation to something specific. Being able to relate to a situation makes it easier to laugh about it. Overall, I found this entertaining. Relief theory is the best one to describe this situation because it was pure entertainment.

Lead Blog

Hey everyone! This week, I decided to share a video clip from the Ellen Show. While I was watching youtube the other day, I stumbled across this video. This is a typical Ellen segment in which she invites people who became famous courtesy of a video that happened to go viral. In this case, Ellen's guests are a mother named Erika and her three year old son John. Erika had recorded a video of herself confronting John about eating sprinkles. We are shown a small portion of the original video, in which John continues to adamantly lie about eating the sprinkles. I found this entire video hilarious. I love baby and kid humor. It's timeless and can make me smile any day. The innocence of children is clearly portrayed in this video. The way John answered each of Ellen's questions with a simple "Yeah!" shows that he wasn't intentionally lying. The part that cracked me up was when Ellen asked John if he had a pet, and he said that he had a puppy named tick. Tick is a rather unusual name for a puppy, and the humor of the situation was increased when the audience learns that "Tick" is a figment of John's imagination. By the time Ellen had asked John if he had ever driven a car, it was clear that he didn't really understand the questions he was being asked. I was surprised by how chill and relaxed the mother was. She seemed to entertain the situation and enjoy the crazy amount of attention her son was receiving. John and his mother's reactions to getting the shirts and the sprinkles was priceless. The most logical theory which could explain the humor of this video would have to be relief theory. It is pure entertainment, and the humor is harmless. Incongruity theory could also work here. It's not common that a family winds up on a universally famous talk show because of a mischievous three year old. The meer fact that John and his mother are being interviewed is hilarious. This is also a relatable scenario. Many parents have experienced times when their young children had been engaging in mischief and were caught red handed. A key to humor is the ability to strike an emotional cord. Overall, I enjoyed this video, and I think that John is an adorable little kid. You can never go wrong with child humor.

Response To Lead Blog November 6

I have heard of the show Wipe Out, but I never knew what it was about. In fact, it sort of reminds me of the show American Ninja Warrior, except that it seems to show more fails than successes. I've never been a fan of these kinds of shows because they are extremely visual. E en when my mom tried to explain the video to me, I wasn't able to properly laugh at it because I wasn't getting the full experience. The things the contestants were doing sounded dangerous. I do find physical humor entertaining. Often ties than not, I laugh at my self when I fall, unless I am in immense pain. I agree that superiority theory is definitely the one that works here. It's easy to think "Haha" when you see someone fall You begin to feel that it sucks for them. Many times, people are glad that it wasn't happening to them. Overall, I laugh at physical humor, but I didn't necessarily find this video funny.

Response To Lead Blog October 30

When I first heard that this video was about talking animals, I was curious. When I hear the term talking animals, I think of the little cartoons I used to watch as a child. This video was interesting. Honestly, at first, I was really confused. I had no idea what was going on. I just heard human voices, and I was thinking that there was no way an animal could produce such sounds. I am amazed as to how this clip was put together. Was it ventriloquism? I had difficulty wrapping my mind around that when the people were speaking, it looked like the animal was speaking. I guess that's just the vision barrier. Either way, I got a laugh out of it. The clips with the laughing birds cracked me up. Laughter is contagious, especially if it sounds funny in the first place. It was funnier because I was imagining a bird actually laughing. Also, the otter that kept calling some one's name was pretty funny as well. This video reminded me of a video I have seen before on YouTube where goats screamed like humans. That video could make anyone crack a smile. The screams were so similar to human ones it was unbelievable. I think that the fact that we new that humans were doing the talking sort of took away some of the humor. However, I attribute most of my confusion to the visual aspects of the clips. I do agree that incongruity theory was definitely a possible reason for laughter in this situation. Most people don't expect others to so deeply try to interpret animal behaviors.